Legal Opinion
Page v. Principe
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 1963No. Civ. 21017PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
Plaintiff received a judgment of $4,000 against defendants as and for the reasonable value of his services to them. Defendants appeal.
The defendants, who are husband and wife, owned a parcel of real property near Hayward, California, situated within an area of condemnation undertaken by the Hayward Union High School District. The property was improved by three single family dwellings and one duplex. The district had included it in an eminent domain action filed in August 1956.
Plaintiff was a real estate broker and appraiser. Defendant husband’s sister (“Dolly”) was employed in the office of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Kreling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Trumbo v. Bank of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Caminetti v. National Guaranty Life Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Zint v. Topp Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Cline v. YamagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- K. King and G. Shuler Corp. v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Longshore v. DesmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Fellom v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969