Legal Opinion
Longshore v. Desmond
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 11, 1963No. Civ. 21277PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying the appellant’s petition to revoke probate of her mother’s will. The only question is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings and conclusions of the court below.
Helene L. Desmond died on May 28, 1959, leaving a holographic will dated August 31, 1951, which was admitted to probate on September 17, 1959. The chief beneficiary is the respondent, William L. Desmond, one of the sons of the decedent and the executor named in the instrument. The other beneficiaries are the remaining adult children of the deceased and three of her ten minor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Cuneo v. MondaniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Estate of TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Seidler v. GoodspeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Cronin v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tucker v. PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Mason v. MasonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Vaught v. VaughtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- White v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- In Re: Estate of Gloria Eleanor FranklinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.