Legal Opinion

Zint v. Topp Industries, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1960No. Civ. 24197PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in their favor for the reasonable value of services performed. The complaint is in two counts: one, on an express contract to pay $88,011.05; the other, for the reasonable value of services performed. The court found there was not an express contract. This finding is not challenged. Plaintiffs were awarded $3,000. They claim their services were worth more than that amount.

Haller, Raymond and Brown, a corporation, called Haller, operated a research and development business at State College, Pennsylvania. The personnel of Haller included trained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tesseyman v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Gold v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Collier v. LandramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Marson v. RandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Fuschi v. Vir DenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. Los Angeles Biltmore Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Page v. PrincipeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Pass v. Industrial Asphalt of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API