Zint v. Topp Industries, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in their favor for the reasonable value of services performed. The complaint is in two counts: one, on an express contract to pay $88,011.05; the other, for the reasonable value of services performed. The court found there was not an express contract. This finding is not challenged. Plaintiffs were awarded $3,000. They claim their services were worth more than that amount.
Haller, Raymond and Brown, a corporation, called Haller, operated a research and development business at State College, Pennsylvania. The personnel of Haller included trained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tesseyman v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Gold v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Collier v. LandramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Marson v. RandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Fuschi v. Vir DenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gibbons v. Los Angeles Biltmore Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Page v. PrincipeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Pass v. Industrial Asphalt of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966