Legal Opinion

K. King and G. Shuler Corp. v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1968No. Civ. 30348PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AISO, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiff, The K. King and The G. Shuler Corporation, appeals from the judgment awarding it $300 on its first amended complaint against the defendant Theresa King. Consideration of plaintiff’s claims of error in light of the record and the applicable rules of law has led us to conclude that the judgment should be affirmed.

The Factual Background

Because insufficiency of the evidence to support the judg ment and some of the findings constitutes the gravamen of the appeal, the facts will be set forth in some detail.

In June of 1962, Frank’s Golden Rooster, a corporation…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Alvarez v. Felker Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Thompson v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API