K. King and G. Shuler Corp. v. King
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
AISO, J. pro tem. *
Plaintiff, The K. King and The G. Shuler Corporation, appeals from the judgment awarding it $300 on its first amended complaint against the defendant Theresa King. Consideration of plaintiff’s claims of error in light of the record and the applicable rules of law has led us to conclude that the judgment should be affirmed.
The Factual Background
Because insufficiency of the evidence to support the judg ment and some of the findings constitutes the gravamen of the appeal, the facts will be set forth in some detail.
In June of 1962, Frank’s Golden Rooster, a corporation…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Alvarez v. Felker Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Thompson v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.