Legal Opinion
Cline v. Yamaga
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 1979No. Civ. 21025PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Plaintiff sued to recover a real estate broker’s commission allegedly due under a written agreement with defendants executed in 1965. Trial was to the court and decision was in favor of defendants, the court concluding that plaintiff’s recovery was barred by Business and Professions Code section 10136 which requires proof in an action for a real estate commission that the plaintiff was duly licensed at the time the alleged cause of action arose. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
The facts are not in dispute. In 1963 defendants owned approximately 12 acres of land in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Silver v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Moses N. Aslan, Debtor. Moses N. Aslan Irving Sulmeyer, Trustee v. Sycamore Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- People v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Welch v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Del Mar v. CaspeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- County of San Mateo v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.