Legal Opinion

Fellom v. Adams

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1969No. Civ. 24599PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

The defendant Adams has appealed from a judgment which awarded the plaintiffs principal, accrued interest and attorney’s fees in an action on a promissory note. He contends, for the first time on appeal, that since the record reveals that the consideration for the note was. services rendered in a real estate transaction the plaintiffs cannot recover beca,use of a failure to allege and prove that they were duly licensed as a salesman and. broker, respectively. (See Bus. & Prof. Code, § 10136.) He further asserts that there was a lack of consideration for -the note because it was given for an…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Consul Limited, Kenneth B. Wilson Dba Ken Wilson Associates v. Solide Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and Hrh Operating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Merrifield v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Kaiser Industries Corp. v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. People v. ThackerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API