Legal Opinion

Schultz v. McLean

California Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1892No. 13991PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

In addition to the facts of this case, disclosed by the findings hereinafter recited, it is proper to add that the plaintiffs, George Schultz and Henry Von Bargén, were the owners of a large tract of land in the county of San Luis Obispo, of the value of forty-five thousand dollars, which was mortgaged to one J. B. Hag-gin for about twenty-six thousand dollars, who had obtained a decree of foreclosure, and was threatening to sell the land thereunder. Plaintiffs were clients of the law firm of Robinson, Olney & Byrne, and C. P. Robinson, a member of the firm, informed plaintiffs that he had a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Perrin v. LepperMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Overacre v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Stewart v. WhitlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Burns v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Wittenbrock v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Jacks v. EsteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API