Mullenary v. Burton
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. J. W. Taggart, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
Action on account for services. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, from which judgment, and a conditional order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.
The complainant alleges that on January 1, 1889, defendant employed plaintiff as ranch superintendent and agreed to pay him for such services $600 per annum; and, in addition, to furnish plaintiff and his family board. Plaintiff concedes a payment for such services to the extent of $1,624, and alleges the balance to be unpaid. The complaint contains a second count, which avers that plaintiff’s wife performed services on said ranch as cook for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Anderson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Churchill v. WoodworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Mix v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Burton v. MullenaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. G. W. McNear, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Union Oil Co. v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Southern Pacific Co. v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Birkhauser v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929