Mix v. Miller
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment, and order denying a new trial, in the Twelfth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Daixgerfield, J. After the decision, the appellant filed his petition that the appeal be reheard in Bank, and the application was denied.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court:
This was an action to recover the value of services for making a search and abstract of the Las Animas rancho, and for money expended for traveling expenses, stationery, board, and assistants.
The Court below found, among other facts, that the work was completed in a workmanlike and professional manner, on the 20th of September, 1876; that the abstract was on that day delivered to the defendant, who received the same and was satisfied with it; that the services rendered were reasonably worth $10,000; that there had been paid on account of them $2,800, leaving due and unpaid a balance…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Courteney v. Standard Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Easterbrook v. FarquharsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Chickasha v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.