Burton v. Mullenary
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County denying a new trial. W. S. Day, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the. court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action to quiet plaintiff’s title as against the defendant, Mullenary, to a city lot in the city of Santa Barbara. The lot is described in the complaint by metes and bounds, and the description shows it to be a lot ninety feet by four hundred and fifty feet, situated on the northwesterly corner of Cola and De la Vina streets in said city. Defendant sets up a defense, and claim of ownership which will be noticed hereafter. The findings and judgment were for plaintiff; and defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
On February 7, 1895, the lot in question was…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Joyce v. TomasiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Linder v. Vogue Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Bond v. AickleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Kirkpatrick v. TowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Mullenary v. BurtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.