Lockhart v. Allstate Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
The subject of this appeal is a summary judgment in favor of Allstate as to its duty to defend appellants in a tort action and coverage of its homeowners’ insurance policy issued to appellants.
Section II of the Allstate policy provides in pertinent part:
“COVERAGE X—Family Liability
Allstate agrees to pay on behalf of the Insured all sums which the Insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury or property damage, to which this insurance applies, caused by an occurrence. Allstate shall have the right and duty, at its own expense, to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Home Insurance Company v. NeilsenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Walters v. American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Parsons v. Continental National American GroupArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Vanguard Insurance Company v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Commerce & Industry Insurance v. Bank of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Farmers Ins. Group v. SessionsIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- McAndrews v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Stein v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.