Legal Opinion

Vanguard Insurance Company v. Cantrell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 20, 1973No. 2 CA-CIV 1264PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

This appeal seeks review of two judgments entered in garnishment proceedings, consolidated for trial. Vanguard challenges a judgment in the amount of $25,000, the face amount of its insurance policy, in favor of the Cantrells. The second judgment, in favor of Allstate and against the Cantrells, is challenged by the Cantrells.

Basically, the question is whether Vanguard’s homeowners policy or Allstate’s automobile liability policy covers injuries sustained by Mr. Cantrell as a consequence of certain conduct on the part of both companies’ insured, Browning. (We shall hereinafter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. Mason v. Celina Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  3. Putman v. ZeluffMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Alm v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Smith v. MoranAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Continental Western Insurance v. ToalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. VagnozziArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Clark v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API