Legal Opinion

Commerce & Industry Insurance v. Bank of Hawaii

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1992No. 15715PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

From a declaratory judgment action to determine the scope of plaintiff-appellant Commerce & Industry Insurance Company’s (CIIC) duty to defend, CIIC appeals an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Bank of Hawaii (BOH) and holding that CIIC had a duty to defend BOH even after claims covered by CIIC were dismissed in the underlying litigation.

We agree with the lower court that dismissal of the emotional distress claim which gave rise to the initial duty to defend did not finally dispose of the potential for coverage. Because the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. First Ins. Co. of Hawaii v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sturla, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Lockhart v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dairy Road Partners v. Island Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. The Burlington Insurance Company v. Oceanic Design & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Tri-S Corp. v. Western World Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API