Home Insurance Company v. Neilsen
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGarrard, J.
Appellees, Neilsen and Smolek, were neighboring farmers. A dispute arose between them which culminated in Neilsen striking Smolek with his fist. Smolek brought suit for assault and battery. Neilsen then notified appellant (the Company) to defend on the basis that he was protected by the comprehensive liability and medical payments provisions of his homeowner’s policy. The Company refused, asserting there was no coverage. Neilsen then brought this action for declaratory judgment. After trial, the court entered judgment that the Company was required to defend in Smolek’s suit and that:
“. . .…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Ruby WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Morrill v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. AlterovitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- MacDonald v. United Pacific InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Grange Insurance Co. v. BrosseauWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Bailey v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Pachucki v. Republic Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.