Legal Opinion
Ross v. Mayflower Drug Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 27, 1940No. Appeal, 91PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stern,
Defendant, Mayflower Drug Stores, Inc., was insured by the St. Paul Mercury and Indemnity Company against liability for accidents. The policy, after setting forth the covenants on the part of the company, provided that “The Foregoing Agreements Are Subject to the Following Conditions: . . . (3) The Assured, upon the occurrence of an accident, shall give prompt written notice thereof, with the fullest information obtain able at the time, to the St. Paul, Minnesota, Office of the Company, or to its duly authorized agent.”
On December 18, 1932, Marie Ross, minor…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Hoffman v. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Barclay v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Hughes v. Central Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Kinch Et Ux. v. FlukeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Meierdierck v. MILLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Unverzagt v. PresteraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Jeannette Glass Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Hallman v. Marquette Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.