Legal Opinion

Meierdierck v. MILLER

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1959No. Appeal, 245PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

The appellee, Victor Meierdierck, plaintiff in a trespass action recovered a judgment against Herman Miller. This action was then taken against the Eureka Casualty Company, garnishee, to collect the judgment, Miller being an assured of Eureka. Eureka refused to pay the judgment alleging they had not received written notice of the accident in accordance with the terms of the policy which provided that: “When an accident occurs written notice shall be given by or on behalf of the insured to the company or to any of its authorized agents as soon as practicable.” This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Unverzagt v. PresteraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Hughes v. Central Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Ross v. Mayflower Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Cameron EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Jeannette Glass Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. August v. StasakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Viani v. Aetna Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Stroh v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Iron Mountain Security Storage Corp. v. American Specialty Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API