Legal Opinion

Jeannette Glass Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1952No. Appeal, 5PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Drew,

Under the notice provision of an insurance policy covering liability for personal injuries, must notice be given promptly after an accident or, is the provision satisfied by the giving of notice only after the insured has learned of its potential liability by having suit filed against it eight months later? The learned court below held in this case that notice was required promptly after the accident and directed a verdict for defendant, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America. Judgment was entered on that verdict and the insured, The Jeannette Glass…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Unverzagt v. PresteraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Curran v. National Life Insurance Co. of the United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Hughes v. Central Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Ross v. Mayflower Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Moeller v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  3. Meierdierck v. MILLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Southern Guaranty Insurance Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Metal Bank of America, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API