Legal Opinion

Kinch Et Ux. v. Fluke

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1933No. Appeal, 6PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Kinch and wife, appellants, on September 24, 1923, purchased by written agreement (not recorded) from Robert E. Fluke and James H. O’Rorke, trading as The Home Realty Company, a dwelling house in Altoona for $6,000. Of this sum $2,261.14 was paid in cash on the execution of the agreement. The balance $3,738.86 was to be paid in monthly installments of $35 each, with interest on deferred payments. The legal title was in Fluke. On October 8th of the same year, the purchasers entered into open, exclusive and notorious possession of the premises and occupied it as a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Maul v. RiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Catlin v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  3. O'Maley v. PuglieseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Stonecipher v. KeaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Byrne v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. McCannon v. MarstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Sidle v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Malamed v. SedelskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Ross v. Mayflower Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Mccannon v. MarstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API