Legal Opinion

Farina v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 21, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

The plaintiff is the owner of certain coin operated devices, commonly called pinball machines, which were seized by state police officers acting under orders issued by the defendant as commissioner of state police. The plaintiff applied to the Superior Court for an injunction to restrain the defendant from confiscating the seized machines and from seizing other similar machines. After a full trial on the merits, the injunction was denied. The plaintiff has appealed.

There are two statutes which are pertinent to the disposition of the issues involved in this case. They are General Statutes §§…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. State v. . AbbottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. State v. MolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Automatic Music & Vending Corp. v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. Pinball MacHinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. ParkerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966
  5. State v. AgrestaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API