State v. Agresta
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.
All the defendants were found guilty of the crime of frequenting a gambling house1 in violation of § 53-2742 of the General Statutes, after a jury trial, and took appeals. The motion of the parties that the appeals should be combined and consolidated for the purposes of appeal to this court and that the judgment of this court would be conclusive upon all the defendants was granted by the trial court. See Practice Book §§ 606, 677; Bahr Corporation v. O’Brion, 146 Conn. 237, 239; State v. Mazzadra, 141 Conn. 731, 732; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. §§ 286, 291. Since the issues involved in these…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- White v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Tully v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- State v. DwyerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989