Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. . Abbott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1940PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STACY, C. J., concurring in result on the ground that the sufficiency of the indictment is not presented for review, defendant having waived bill and pleaded guilty to possession and distribution of slot machines prohibited by law.

BARNHILL and WINBORNE, JJ., join in concurring opinion. This was a criminal action tried before Honorable R. Hunt Parker, Judge presiding at the September Criminal Term, 1940, for Wake County, for the Seventh Judicial District of the State of North Carolina, said case being tried upon the following bill of indictment:

"State of North Carolina — Superior Court, Wake…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Dixon v. . OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. McCormick v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Rankin v. Mills Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. StroupeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API