State v. Pinball MacHines
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
In Pin-Ball Machine v. State 1 , decided in 1962, there was evidence that certain pinball machines had been so used that money had been paid for free games won on the machines. We held that the machines were gambling implements within the meaning of the statute which requires law enforcement officials in Alaska to seize and destroy all gambling implements. 2 We did not decide whether, lacking evidence of cash payoffs for free games won, such machines were gambling devices in themselves. That is the question that was presented in the two cases now before us. In No. 539 the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. ConstantineSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Morrow v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Automatic Music & Vending Corp. v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. KooCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
- McKenzie v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.