Legal Opinion
State v. Parker
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 11, 1966No. File No. CR 7-7530PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.
The defendant was convicted on one count of keeping slot machines for gambling purposes in violation of §53-278 of the General Statutes and has appealed, assigning error in the court’s rulings on evidence and in its conclusion that upon all the evidence the defendant was guilty as charged beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court found that the defendant was the proprietor of a luncheonette and variety store in Meriden and on April 5, 1965, possessed two pinball machines which were located in his store. The machines are operated by inserting a ten-cent coin in a slot, whereupon one of six cards is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Albert Lopez Gallego v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Breeding v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Plumb v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- United States v. S. B. Penick & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- State v. PalkoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GriffithIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- DeLuna v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. NickersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- State v. NagelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966