Legal Opinion
State v. Mola
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 5, 1941PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The information in this case charged that the appellants, with thirteen others, conspired “to set up and maintain a lottery” and that in furtherance of the conspiracy each participated “in the distribution and sale of lottery tickets, and the collection of the proceeds thereof.” All the defendants were found guilty and the appellants have appealed on the sole ground that while the jury could have found them guilty of a conspiracy to carry on policy playing in violation of § 6337 of the General Statutes, they could not properly find them guilty of conspiring to conduct a lottery or sell…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. HinesNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- State v. DorauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Francis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
3Cited by24 opinions
- Condor Merritt v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. VincentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. SumnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. RafanelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.