Legal Opinion

State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming Devices

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 7, 1985No. 106 September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

This case involves a number of devices seized as illegal “slot machines” under the provisions of ch. 617 of the Acts of 1963, as amended by ch. 280 of the Acts of 1981, now codified as Maryland Code (1982 Repl.Vol.), Article 27, § 264B.

I

Section 264B makes it a criminal offense after a date not here relevant “to locate, possess, keep, maintain or operate any slot machine within this State.” The statute defines a “slot machine” as:

“Any machine, apparatus or device ... that is adapted for use in such a way that, as a result of the insertion or deposit therein, or placing with…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Smith v. HiginbothomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. Two Electronic Poker Game MacHinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Board of Police Commissioners v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  5. State v. One Bally Coney Island No. 21011 Gaming TableSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Prince George's County v. VieiraCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. In Re Wallace W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. State v. 192 Coin-Operated Video Game MacHinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State ex rel. PerdueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. 149 Slot MacHinesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API