Legal Opinion

Kupfer Bros. Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 12, 1916No. 1675PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7852 (T. D. 3G1(>1).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The merchandise in question was invoiced as gold borders. It consists of metal-coated paper cut into strips each about 2⅝ feet long and one-quarter of an inch wide, embossed with a small ornamental design and with the letters “P” and “T.” The strips which appear in the representative sample are 12 in number, and by the process of manufacture remain attached to a very narrow border at each end, evidently maintained for convenience in the use of the strips, which when used are torn off and devoted to their intended purpose. The only testimony in the case tends to show that these strips are used…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fenton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Tilge v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Boye Needle Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Rice Millers' Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Alfred Kohlberg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. Stroheim v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Freund Mayer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API