Alfred Kohlberg, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
TilsoN, Judge:
In this suit against tbe United States the plaintiff seeks to recover a judgment for a certain sum of money alleged to have been illegally levied on an importation of gloves from China. There is nothing in the official papers forwarded by the collector from which we can ascertain how the merchandise was classified. However, since this case was tried and submitted by counsel upon the theory that the merchandise was classified as lace gloves and assessed with duty at 90 per centum under paragraph 1529 of the Tariff Act of 1930, we shall adopt that theory and decide the case…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. Doragon Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. MacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. Burlington Venetian Blind Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Accurate Millinery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Accurate Millinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Davies Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Protests 10324-K of Geo. S. Bush & Co.United States Customs Court · 1940
- Protests 12532-K of FrawleyUnited States Customs Court · 1940