Stroheim v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
This appeal, by the importers, from the decision of the Board of General Appraisers, involves the construction of paragraph 903 of *490tbe Tariff Act of 1922, under the third part of which the importations, cotton cloth, were admittedly properly dutiable and which paragraph reads as follows:
903. Cotton cloth, printed, dyed, colored, or woven-figured, containing yarn8 the average number of which does not exceed number 40, fifty-five one-hundredths of 1 cent per average number per pound; exceeding number 40, 22 cents per pound and, in addition thereto, sixty-five one-hundredths of 1 cent per…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hamilton v. RathboneSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. MarschingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Fensterer & Voss Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Kupfer Bros. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bentkamp v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Wilson & Son (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926