Legal Opinion

Stroheim v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 2, 1926No. 2584PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This appeal, by the importers, from the decision of the Board of General Appraisers, involves the construction of paragraph 903 of *490tbe Tariff Act of 1922, under the third part of which the importations, cotton cloth, were admittedly properly dutiable and which paragraph reads as follows:

903. Cotton cloth, printed, dyed, colored, or woven-figured, containing yarn8 the average number of which does not exceed number 40, fifty-five one-hundredths of 1 cent per average number per pound; exceeding number 40, 22 cents per pound and, in addition thereto, sixty-five one-hundredths of 1 cent per…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. RathboneSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. MarschingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Fensterer & Voss Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  5. Kupfer Bros. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bentkamp v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. Wilson & Son (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API