Legal Opinion

Freund Mayer & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 25, 1950No. C. D. 1280PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Certain paper napkins, imported from England, were classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as manufactures of paper, not specially provided for, and assessed with duty at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1413 of the Tariff Act of 1930. A protest was duly filed against such classification and assessment, claiming that said merchandise is properly dutiable at only 30 per centum ad valorem, as paper, embossed, cut, die-cut, or stamped into designs or shapes, which is likewise provided for in said paragraph 1413.

*167The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kupfer Bros. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  3. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Freund Mayer & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API