Legal Opinion

Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 9, 1916No. 1630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstracts 38595 and 38865.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The mérch- ndise involved in this case consists of cue tips. It was assessed for duty as a manufacture of leather under paragraph 360 of the act of 1913. The importers protested, claiming free entry under various paragraphs, but have limited their discussion under claim for free entry to paragraph 530. The claim was also made, and L urged here, that if not free the merchandise is subject to duty at 15 per cent only, under paragraph 385, as an unenumerated manufactured article.

The evidence discloses that the merchandise consists of rounded leather tips, consisting of two kinds of leather, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Tilge v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Devoy v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kupfer Bros. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Bush & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. United States v. Portenoy Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API