Legal Opinion

Fenton v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 24, 1911No. 385PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 23431 (T. D. 30667).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise involved is so-called cork floats, was imported at the port of Cleveland in 1909, and was assessed for duty by the *530collector at 45 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 165 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909, which reads as follows:

165. Fish hooks, fishing rods and reels, artificial flies, artificial baits, snelled hooks and all other fishing tackle or parts thereof, not specially provided for in this section, except fishing lines, fishing nets and seines, forty-five per centum ad valorem.

The appellant duly filed .his protest, the material parts of which are as follows:

Notice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Lawrence v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1849

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. Rink v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Kleinberger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Charles B. Chrystal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  5. Redden v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API