Legal Opinion
Albahary v. City and Town of Bristol, Conn.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 23, 2000No. Civil Action 3:94cv1891 (JBA)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES
[DOC. # 84]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
In this motion, Plaintiffs seek an order that Bristol pay them postjudgment inter est pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 on the Court’s award of attorneys fees from the date this Court entered its original judgment (September 29, 1998) through the date this attorney fees award is/has been paid in full. While Defendant Bristol does not contest that Plaintiffs are entitled to “some post-judgment interest,” see Def.’s Opp’n at 1 and 3, it contends the post-judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. KellstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Michael J. Foley v. City of Lowell, Massachusetts, Michael J. Foley v. City of Lowell, MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Copper Liquor, Inc., Robert Earl Basham, Jr., of the Estate of Harold Letcher, Deceased, Cross-Appellant v. Adolph Coors Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Mathis v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barrella v. Village of FreeportDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Boehner v. McDermottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- King v. JCS Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Hubbard v. TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Chabad Lubavitch of Litchfield County Inc v. LitchfieldDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020