Legal Opinion
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Bonjorno
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 4, 1990No. 88-1595PublishedCited by 992 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
We are called upon in these cases to decide the applicable rate of postjudgment interest and the date from which post-judgment interest should be calculated pursuant to the federal postjudgment interest statute. 28 U. S. C. § 1961 (1982 ed.) (amended).
I
Respondents (Bonjorno) were the sole stockholders of now defunct Columbia Metal Culvert Co., Inc., which was at one time a fabricator of aluminum drainage pipe in Vineland, New Jersey. Bonjorno brought suit against petitioners (Kaiser) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on the theory that Kaiser had…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by992 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Yajure HurtadoBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2025
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Geneva Butts v. The City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
987 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.