Legal Opinion
Mathis v. Spears
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 6, 1988No. Nos. 86-1574, 86-1575, 86-1591, 86-1608, 86-1611 and 86-1643PublishedCited by 129 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Appeals and cross-appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California (Pfael-zer, J.), setting the quantum of previously granted awards of attorney fees and expenses. Cleo D. Mathis and Vico Products Manufacturing Co., Inc. (Mathis) challenge the amount and bases of the awards. Bill Spears d/b/a Waterway Plastics, Waterway Plastics, Inc., Philip E. Chalberg, Robert Weygand, Hydrabaths, Hydro Air Industries, Inc., and Gerald Moreland (collectively Hydro) challenge the denial of prejudgment interest on the award. We remand that…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Brasseler, U.S.A. I, L.P. v. Stryker Sales Corporation and Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. LKB Produkter ABCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.