Hubbard v. TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST [Doc. #U1]
VANESSA L. BRYANT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs motion for post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). Based on the court’s review of the motion, the defendant’s objection [Doc. 147], the facts and the law as forth below, the motion is GRANTED.
I. Facts
On September 28, 2005, the plaintiff, Sharon Hubbard, brought a seven count complaint against the defendant, Total Communications, Inc. (“Total”). Counts one and two alleged that Total…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jenkins v. The State Of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- King v. JCS Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Albahary v. City and Town of Bristol, Conn.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Collins v. StolzenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- JTH Tax, Inc. v. SawhneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. AhmedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022