Legal Opinion
Boehner v. McDermott
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2008No. Civ. 98-0594 (TFH)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court are Congressman John A. Boehner’s Revised Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Interest (# 95) and Congressman Boehner’s Supplemental Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Interest (# 103). While the parties agree Congressman Boehner is entitled to attorneys’ fees, costs, and interest pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511(l)(c), 2520(a) & (b)(3), and this Court’s previous opinions and orders, they disagree as to the amount to which Congressman Boehner is entitled.
In total, Congressman Boehner requests an award of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. KellstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Rimkus v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Harvey v. MohammedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.