Legal Opinion

Lavely v. Nonemaker

California Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 12058PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment setting aside and canceling a deed to certain real property and decreeing that plaintiff is the owner of an undivided one-half interest therein.

The plaintiff and defendant are father and daughter, respectively, and each is the owner of an undivided one-half interest in the property. In a complaint containing two counts, one grounded in fraud and the other averring undue influence, the plaintiff, a man well along in years, alleges that while he was in a weak and infirm condition and suffering from shaking palsy, he was induced to transfer and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Schirmer v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Stearns v. Fair Employment Practice CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API