Legal Opinion
Krmpotich v. City of Duluth
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 11, 1991No. C5-90-2036, C7-90-2037 and C8-90-2354PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellants Krmpotich and Dahlgren, separate citizen groups, oppose a retail mall development proposed by respondent Watson. The Krmpotich appellants challenge various actions of the Duluth City Council that would permit the Watson development, including procedures followed in enacting a rezoning ordinance. The Dahlgren appellants challenge the Watson development under the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA). The trial court granted summary judgment to respondents Watson and Duluth on the Krmpotich claims. The Dahlgren claim under the Minnesota Environmental Rights…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Krmpotich v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Nightclub Management, Ltd. v. City of Cannon FallsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000