Legal Opinion
VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota Heights
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 8, 1983No. C5-82-1178PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
Appellant, City of Mendota Heights (City), appeals from a judgment of the Dakota County District Court ordering the City to grant respondent VanLandschoot’s application for the subdivision of Lot 18, Linden Addition to the City of Mendota Heights (Lot 18) and, further, to grant him certain requested variances in order to allow him to build two houses on the subdivided lots. The trial court concluded the City’s action in denying the application for subdivision and the variances incident thereto was arbitrary, unreasonable and capricious. We reverse.
In 1976, Ronald Smith,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of ShoreviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Matthew v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Cromwell v. WardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re StadsvoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Handicraft Block Ltd. Partnership v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.