Legal Opinion

Krmpotich v. City of Duluth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 10, 1992No. C5-90-2036, C7-90-2037 and C8-90-2354PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMONETT, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether the court of appeals exceeded the scope of its appellate authority in reversing the trial court’s declaration that the Watson Development project did not violate the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act. We reverse.

The factual and procedural history is detailed in the decision of the court of appeals. Krmpotich v. City of Duluth, 474 N.W.2d 392 (Minn.App.1991). Briefly, Watson Centers purchased an option to buy approximately 35 acres of property located in the Miller Hill area of Duluth, intending to create a 267,000 square foot strip…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. County of Freeborn v. BrysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Krmpotich v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Prior Lake American v. MaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. Archabal v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Melrose Gates, LLC v. Chor MouaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API