Fortec Constructors v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
This contract case arises out of a dispute over a contract for the construction of an aircraft fuel maintenance facility at Moody Air Force Base, Georgia. During the course of performance of the contract, six unilateral modifications were issued by the Government. As a result, the plaintiff contends that it is entitled to extensions of contract time for work performed beyond the contract requirements and to additional direct and extended overhead costs incurred in performing this extra work, together with remission of all liquidated damages.
Facts
The plaintiff, Fortec…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United Engineering & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Blinderman Construction Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- William F. Klingensmith, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Haney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- George Sollitt Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Blinderman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Wilner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.