Legal Opinion

Haney v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 10, 1982No. 571-77PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the court on both plaintiffs and defendant’s exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge Francis C. Browne, filed December 31, 1980, pursuant to Rule 134(h). The claim as upheld by Trial Judge Browne is for breach of a "build and lease” contract. Oral argument has been heard in this matter and the court has also considered the written exceptions and briefs in support thereof, submitted by the parties. Since *150the court agrees with the recommended decision of the trial judge,* as hereafter set forth, it affirms and adopts that decision together with the following…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. Dasa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Knotts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  4. Knotts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. Librach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. Morrison Knudsen Corp. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. Sterling Millwrights, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API