Legal Opinion

William F. Klingensmith, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 19, 1984No. Appeal 83-1131PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KASHIWA, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., appellant (contractor) appeals a decision of the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals (the “Board”) denying its claim for a contract time extension of 32 calendar days plus impact costs of $72,032. The Board concluded that the delay occurred because of appellant’s poor scheduling and not because appellant was required to remove an unexpected smoke tunnel from the site. Because we conclude that the Board failed to address a second issue raised, whether the delay occurred because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Blinderman Construction Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  3. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Ace Construction Company, a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Conrac Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Melvin Wilner, D/B/A Wilner Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Sauer Incorporated v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  4. P.R. Burke Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API