Legal Opinion

Getchell v. Mansfield

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1971PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

In this malpractice case the trial court granted a nonsuit in favor of the defendant physician Mansfield and the jury returned a verdict for the defendant physician Hiestand. The plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff fell and hurt her shoulder. She went to the defendant Mansfield, a general practitioner in a small Portland suburb. He diagnosed her condition as a shoulder separation and advised that surgical repair would be necessary. He sent plaintiff to the defendant Hiestand, an orthopedist. Hiestand performed the surgery by joining the separated shoulder parts with wires. Later, the wires broke…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Dewey v. A. F. Klaveness & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Boyce v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Daly v. LiningerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  2. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Winkjer v. HerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API