Legal Opinion

Faber v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1991No. 16-88-10307, CA A63604PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiffs operate a tree nursery. Defendant is in the business of applying herbicides along railroad rights-of-way under contracts with railroad companies. On two occasions in 1987 and on two occasions in 1988, defendant applied herbicides to a right-of-way immediately adjacent to plaintiffs’ facility, and extensive damage to plaintiffs’ tree crops allegedly resulted. Plaintiffs brought this action, alleging claims, inter alia, for intentional trespass, unintentional trespass and negligence. They sought compensatory and punitive damages. Although the punitive damages claim was submitted to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hudson v. Peavey Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Andor v. United Air Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Banaitis v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Wieck v. HostetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Hager v. Tire Recyclers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Mason v. BCK Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API