Legal Opinion

Hadley v. Extreme Technologies, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 2015No. 161103225; A151851PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

Defendant, Extreme Technologies, Inc., designs, manufactures, and sells archery equipment, including bows. When plaintiff, Claude Hadley, agreed to share with defendant his idea for a new bow design, which was unknown in the industry at the time, the parties entered into a nondisclosure agreement. Under the agreement, defendant agreed not to independently use or disclose the information provided to it by plaintiff for a period of two years; if defendant did independently use or disclose the information, plaintiff would be entitled to a broad range of remedies. Plaintiff ultimately sued…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Williams v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Purdy v. Deere & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Brown v. BonesteeleOregon Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bush v. City of Prineville (A165637)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Van Atta v. Stephanie Fry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Big River Construction, Inc. v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Multi/Tech Engineering Services, Inc. v. Innovative Design & Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. In re SiragusaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API