Hadley v. Extreme Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.
Defendant, Extreme Technologies, Inc., designs, manufactures, and sells archery equipment, including bows. When plaintiff, Claude Hadley, agreed to share with defendant his idea for a new bow design, which was unknown in the industry at the time, the parties entered into a nondisclosure agreement. Under the agreement, defendant agreed not to independently use or disclose the information provided to it by plaintiff for a period of two years; if defendant did independently use or disclose the information, plaintiff would be entitled to a broad range of remedies. Plaintiff ultimately sued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Timberline Equipment Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Williams v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Purdy v. Deere & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Brown v. BonesteeleOregon Supreme Court · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bush v. City of Prineville (A165637)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Van Atta v. Stephanie Fry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Big River Construction, Inc. v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Multi/Tech Engineering Services, Inc. v. Innovative Design & Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- In re SiragusaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018