People v. Bidleman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and' County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Appellant is charged with the embezzlement of seven thousand four hundred and eighty-six dollars and sixty-three cents, the moneys of D. V. B. Plenarie, doing business under the firm name of E. Martin & Co., in the city and county of San Francisco, and was found guilty of the embezzlement of seven hundred and seventeen dollars and sixty-five cents, part of the sum charged in the information, and was sentenced to imprisonment for the term of four years. His motion for a new trial having been denied he appeals from the judgment and order denying a new trial.
Appellant contends that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. Lee Yune ChongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. WaltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Spottiswood v. WeirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. EbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. TomaltyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- State v. KeifeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.