Legal Opinion

People v. Gallagher

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1893No. 20972PublishedCited by 78 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and'from an order denying a new trial. .The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court

The appellant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement, and has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The indictment charges that at the county of Alameda one Richard G. Beggs, a clerk, agent, and servant of the “ Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Company” (a corporation), embezzled eight thousand five hundred dollars, the personal property of said company, and that the defendant, B. F. Gallagher, did aid and abet said Beggs in such embezzlement.

The first point made by appellant is that Beggs did not commit the crime of embezzlement as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RozelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Ex parte HedleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. State v. McKinzieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. FauberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. WestekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. AtchleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API