Legal Opinion
People v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1934No. Crim. 1352PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The defendant was convicted of the offense of embezzlement, and from the order of the court denying his motion for new trial, and entering judgment of conviction, this appeal is taken. The indictment upon which the appellant was arraigned and tried is in the following words and figures, to wit. (Omitting title):
“The Grand Jury of the County of Sacramento hereby accuses Forrest C. Hill of the crime of grand theft committed as follows: That on or about the 21st day of October, A. D. 1930, at the County of Sacramento, in the State of California, Forrest C. Hill did then and there wilfully,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. SelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. DitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. CavanaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. IvesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sanguinetti v. SanguinettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.