Legal Opinion

People v. Ebanks

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1897No. Crim. No. 209PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from orders refusing to arrest the judgment and denying a new trial. W. L. Pierce, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

The defendant,. Joseph Japhet Ebanks, was charged by in formation with the murder of Harriet Stiles, at the county of San Diego, state of California, on the tenth day of September, 1895, and, upon a trial had under said information, was convicted of murder in the first degree, and sentenced to death.

Defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Defendant moved to set aside the information upon *655the grounds: 1. That, before the filing thereof, the defendant had not been legally committed by a magistrate; 2. That it was not subscribed by the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Pierson v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. People v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Commonwealth v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. MacKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Harding v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API